The Corset and the Canvas as Objects The drive’s object is the most variable element; in Frida , the corset and the easel function as partial objects. When Kahlo paints from her bed (00:35:00), Taymor frames the canvas as a mirror—the paintbrush touches the canvas as a hand touches skin. The sequence of “The Broken Column” (01:12:00) literalizes the drive’s aim (to circle back to the body). A superimposition shows Kahlo’s painted spine as a cracked Ionic column; the camera pans slowly, merging the viewer’s look with Kahlo’s self-regard. This is the reflexive moment of the drive: seeing oneself seeing.
Diego Rivera as the Invocatory Counterpoint Whereas the scopic drive dominates, the invocatory drive (voice) appears in the film’s sound design. Rivera’s booming voice often interrupts Kahlo’s visual concentration. In the Detroit sequence (00:52:00), Kahlo listens to Rivera’s praise while staring at a miscarriage in a glass jar. Taymor mutes Rivera’s voice, reducing it to a rhythmic thrum—the drive’s pressure without semantic content. This suggests that the artistic drive does not seek recognition but repetition.
Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen , 16(3), 6–18.
Metz, C. (1982). The imaginary signifier: Psychoanalysis and the cinema . Indiana University Press.
Freud, S. (1915). Instincts and their vicissitudes. In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 14, pp. 109–140). Hogarth Press.
The Accident as Traumatic Source Freud defines the drive’s source as somatic excitation. In Frida , the bus accident (00:12:15–00:14:30) is shot with fragmented close-ups—a handrail piercing the abdomen, gold dust and blood mixing. Taymor uses slow motion and non-diegetic dissonant strings to transform the event into a primal scene of bodily invasion. Here, the drive’s pressure (constant force) emerges: Kahlo’s subsequent painting begins as an attempt to bind this unrepresentable rupture.