On paper, this was a failure. In practice, it was a liberation. Michaelson understood a dirty secret of the audio industry: high global negative feedback, the tool most engineers used to achieve high wattage with low distortion, was the enemy of transient response and harmonic integrity. The FX was designed around a different principle:
Modern Class D amplifiers now boast 90% efficiency and 0.0001% distortion, yet many listeners still hunt for the FX. Why? Because the FX reminds us that high fidelity is not a number. It is the illusion of a live performance. By sacrificing power for purity, and features for focus, Musical Fidelity created an amplifier that does not just reproduce music—it understands the importance of the first watt. musical fidelity fx power amplifier
Because of the low-feedback, high-bandwidth design, the FX handles leading-edge transients—the strike of a piano hammer, the snap of a snare drum—with startling realism. There is no smearing. But the real magic is in the micro-dynamics. At low volume, late at night, the FX retrieves the subtle decay of a cymbal or the breath of a saxophonist with a delicacy that 200-watt behemoths often crush under their own authority. On paper, this was a failure
This simplicity is a double-edged sword. It makes the FX brutally honest. It has no "house sound" to mask a poor recording. Play a thin, bright CD, and the FX will punish you with clinical ferocity. Play a well-recorded jazz trio, however, and the amplifier disappears. The silence between notes is so profound that you hear the recording venue’s ambient air, not the amplifier’s noise floor. To describe the FX’s sound, one must abandon the usual audiophile clichés. It does not sound "warm" (like a tube amp) nor "cold" (like a poorly designed solid-state amp). Instead, it sounds fast . The FX was designed around a different principle:
Musical Fidelity employed a fetishistically simple dual-mono design. Two toroidal transformers (one for each channel) sit at the front, isolated from a remarkably small number of gain stages. There are no tone controls, no headphone jacks, no "processor loops." This is a machine with a single purpose: to amplify the input signal without adding or subtracting anything but amplitude.
However, the FX has a fatal flaw for the careless user: it demands sympathetic partners. With 50 watts, it is useless on power-hungry electrostatic speakers or large floor-standers with impedance dips below 4 ohms. But pair it with high-efficiency (90dB+) stand-mount monitors—a classic Spendor, a Harbeth, or an old pair of Klipsch Heresy—and the FX becomes a window, not a wall. In 2024, the Musical Fidelity FX is a cult classic, frequently changing hands on the used market for a fraction of its original price. It serves as a philosophical totem for a specific kind of audiophile: one who values musical engagement over specifications.
Then came the Musical Fidelity FX. At first glance, it seemed to confirm every boring stereotype. It was a black box, bereft of the signature heat sinks that made rival amplifiers look like industrial art. But to dismiss the FX as just another "mule" is to miss one of the most radical, counter-intuitive, and musically compelling statements in solid-state design. The FX was born in an era of excess. The late 1980s and 1990s were dominated by the "Wattage Wars"—amplifiers boasting 200, 300, even 500 watts per channel, ostensibly to control difficult speakers. Musical Fidelity, under the mercurial leadership of Antony Michaelson, committed heresy. The FX produced a mere 50 watts per channel into 8 ohms.