The inevitable sequel arrives three years later. With the first film a surprise hit, Taboo II faces a classic problem: how to top the original incest? The solution is to widen the net. Kay Parker returns as Barbara, but this time the plot involves her younger sister (Dorothy LeMay) and a complicated web involving the sister’s stepson.
The original Taboo is a legitimate artifact. Directed by Kirdy Stevens, it tells the story of Barbara (Kay Parker), a divorced, lonely woman in her late 30s whose adult son, Paul (Mike Ranger), returns home. After a series of emotionally charged encounters and a disastrous date with a man her own age, Barbara and Paul cross the line. Taboo I-II-III-IV -1979-1985-
To discuss the Taboo series is to discuss a peculiar, uncomfortable, and undeniably influential pillar of the "Golden Age of Porn" (late 60s–mid 80s). In an era that gave us the narrative ambition of The Devil in Miss Jones and the mainstream crossover of Deep Throat , the Taboo films carved out a darker, more psychologically fraught corner of the adult film landscape. They traded slapstick and disco soundtracks for heavy drapes, Oedipal tension, and the magnetic, maternal presence of Kay Parker. Watching Taboo I through IV (1979, 1982, 1984, 1985) is less a marathon of eroticism and more a case study in how a franchise can begin as a transgressive art piece, find its formula, then slowly devolve into mechanical repetition. The inevitable sequel arrives three years later
What makes the first film remarkable is its restraint—at least for the first hour. Stevens shoots the film like a low-budget drama. The lighting is moody, the dialogue is stilted but earnest, and Parker’s performance is genuinely affecting. She doesn’t play a vixen; she plays a tired, sensual, emotionally starved woman. The famous seduction scene, where she hesitates, cries, and then surrenders, is uncomfortable in the best way. It captures the very real psychological friction of the premise. The sex scenes, by modern standards, are soft-focused and unhurried. This isn't gonzo; it's psychodrama. The film’s success—both critical and commercial—hinged entirely on Kay Parker’s ability to make you feel the guilt as much as the pleasure. She is the soul of the series. Without her, the taboo is just a gimmick. Kay Parker returns as Barbara, but this time
Kay Parker is still the anchor, but she is now surrounded by a cast that clearly doesn't understand the original's subtlety. The sex is harder, faster, and more graphic—very much a mid-80s aesthetic. The "secret" is disappointingly mundane. The film tries to add psychological depth (flashbacks to Barbara’s own childhood trauma), but it handles the subject with the delicacy of a sledgehammer. Taboo IV is for completists only. It lacks the dramatic tension of the first, the expanding scope of the second, and even the shameless energy of the third. It feels like a franchise running on fumes, trying to justify another 80 minutes of runtime.
Taboo II is a more polished, but less interesting, film. The taboo is no longer a shocking revelation but an established genre trope. The film introduces a new dynamic: the "cool" aunt figure who initiates the nephew. Dorothy LeMay is fine, but she lacks Parker’s gravitas. The best scenes remain those with Parker, particularly a moment where she lectures her sister about the dangers of desire—a scene dripping with ironic hypocrisy. The production values are higher (better sets, less grain), but the psychological rawness is diluted. It’s still a decent adult drama, but you can feel the franchise shifting from "art film" to "series product."
The fourth entry is the oddity. Subtitled The Secret of the Taboo , this film attempts to be a prequel of sorts, exploring Barbara’s past and the origins of her liberal attitudes. It also introduces a convoluted plot about a mysterious diary. Directed by Peter Savage (under a pseudonym, likely), this film feels disconnected from the first three.