Researchers linked ATIs to cognitive load theory. Learners with high WM capacity can handle the demands of implicit, input-rich environments, whereas learners with lower WM but strong analytical skills require explicit rule presentation to reduce cognitive load (Kormos, 2017). This has direct pedagogical implications: differentiated instruction based on aptitude profiles is not just desirable but potentially necessary. 4. The Implicit-Explicit Debate and Age Effects (2015–2022) A major theoretical fault line in SLA concerns whether aptitude operates similarly for implicit (unconscious, incidental) versus explicit (rule-based, conscious) learning. The past decade has seen a surge in studies using artificial grammar learning and semi-artificial language paradigms.
Using idiodynamic methods (moment-to-moment ratings), Suzuki (2021) showed that learners’ effective WM capacity fluctuates depending on perceived task difficulty and state anxiety. A learner who appears “low aptitude” on a timed grammaticality judgment test may perform as “high aptitude” on a self-paced narrative retell task. twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude
Granena (2013) demonstrated that traditional aptitude tests (MLAT) strongly predict explicit learning but weakly predict implicit learning. Conversely, implicit sequence learning ability (measured via reaction-time tasks) is dissociable from explicit aptitude. This finding has profound implications for age: younger learners, who rely more on implicit mechanisms, may show different aptitude profiles than older learners, who rely on explicit analysis. Researchers linked ATIs to cognitive load theory
Twenty-Five Years of Research on Foreign Language Aptitude: From Cognitive Measurement to Dynamic Systems who rely more on implicit mechanisms